All Resources

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
June 12, 2026
5 min
Resilience in the Workplace

What Is Resilience?

Search the word "resilience" online and you will find millions of explanations. But what does resilience actually mean, why is it important to you, and how can you benefit from resilience training?

We all respond differently to setbacks, failure and trauma. Some people seem to bounce back quickly, while others get caught in a downward spiral of negative thinking. We all know that person: the one who keeps going after every setback, the one who seems to have "Psychological Teflon". Research suggests this is the effect of resilience (1).

At its core, resilience is the ability to bounce back from adversity. It is the capacity to find perspective, and even opportunity, in a difficult or challenging situation. In the modern workplace, resilience helps us navigate constant change, hybrid work pressures, rapid technology shifts including AI, competing priorities and growing workloads.

Why Is Resilience Important?

Beyond the buzz, evidence shows that people with high resilience have a more balanced outlook on life and believe they can learn from mistakes and challenges. Resilient individuals handle adversity better and rebuild more effectively after major life events such as job loss, financial pressure, relationship breakdown or the death of a loved one.

In everyday life, put simply, resilience builds happiness. It helps us make the most of the challenges we face. Resilience will not prevent difficulties, but it prepares us to deal with them more effectively. You may not realise it, but resilience shapes how we respond in almost every situation. There are probably people in your life or workplace who are juggling multiple stressors yet still show up each day with a smile.

The Cost of Low Resilience in the Workplace

The effects of a non-resilient workplace can be far-reaching. Low levels of resilience have been associated with:

  • Increased absenteeism
  • Higher accident rates and workers compensation claims
  • Reduced morale
  • Poor workplace relationships
  • Reduced output and performance
  • Increased staff turnover

After years of disruption, from the pandemic to economic uncertainty and the rise of AI in the workplace, burnout and change fatigue are at record levels. Being able to identify stressors, and understand the effect they have on you and the people around you, has never been more important. With all of the above creating potentially toxic effects across an organisation, building a culture of resilience through resilience training should be a no-brainer for every employer.

Can Resilience Be Taught?

Some people are naturally more resilient than others, but the evidence is clear: resilience can be learned. Resilience training provides real-world strategies and techniques that help you build your "resilience bank". That way, when a challenge inevitably comes your way, you will have effective tools ready to support you.

Key Takeaways

Resilience is not an extraordinary quality. It is ordinary, attainable and demonstrated by everyday people all around us. But resilience is an active process. We need to keep working on it, for ourselves and for a happy, mentally healthy workforce.

All
June 10, 2026
5 min
The Science of Rest, Breaks and Sustainable Performance

Why Recovery at Work?

The evidence is clear: good work is good for health. Research consistently shows that the longer an injured worker stays away from work, the lower their chances of ever returning. Extended time off is associated with slower recovery, social isolation, loss of confidence, financial stress and a higher risk of developing secondary mental health conditions such as anxiety and depression.

In contrast, workers who remain connected to the workplace during recovery tend to heal faster, both physically and psychologically. Work provides routine, purpose, social connection and income, all of which are powerful ingredients in recovery. Doctors and workers compensation authorities across Australia now actively promote recovery at work as the preferred approach for most injuries.

The Benefits of Recovery at Work for Employees

For injured workers, recovering at work delivers real, measurable benefits:

  • Faster recovery: Staying active and engaged in suitable duties supports physical rehabilitation and prevents deconditioning.
  • Better mental health: Routine, purpose and social connection protect against the isolation, low mood and loss of identity that often come with extended time off.
  • Financial stability: Remaining at work, even on modified duties, helps maintain income and reduces the financial pressure that can compound stress during recovery.
  • Job security and confidence: Workers who stay connected keep their skills current, maintain relationships with colleagues and are far more likely to return to their pre-injury role.
  • A sense of control: Being an active participant in your own recovery, rather than waiting passively at home, improves outcomes and wellbeing.

The Benefits of Recovery at Work for Employers

Recovery at work is not just good for the injured worker. It is one of the smartest investments an employer can make:

  • Reduced claim costs and premiums: Shorter time off work means lower workers compensation costs and better claims performance over time.
  • Retained skills and experience: Keeping an experienced worker connected, even in a modified capacity, beats recruiting and training a replacement.
  • Improved morale and culture: When employees see injured colleagues supported rather than sidelined, trust and engagement rise across the whole team.
  • Reduced absenteeism and turnover: Workplaces with strong recovery at work practices see better attendance and retention overall.
  • Legal compliance: Employers have obligations under workers compensation legislation to support injured workers and provide suitable duties where reasonably practicable. A structured program keeps you compliant.

Common Myths About Recovering at Work

Myth: You should be 100 percent recovered before returning to work.
Reality: Waiting for full recovery often delays it. For most injuries, safe and suitable work is part of the treatment.

Myth: Returning early risks making the injury worse.
Reality: A properly designed recovery at work plan is built around medical restrictions. Duties are matched to capacity and upgraded only with the treating practitioner's support.

Myth: Light duties are demeaning or token work.
Reality: Good suitable duties are meaningful and productive. They keep skills current and maintain the worker's value to the team.

Myth: It is easier for everyone if the worker just stays home.
Reality: Extended absence is harder on everyone. The worker risks isolation and a longer recovery, while the employer carries higher claim costs and loses a valued team member.

Key Takeaways

Recovery at work is one of the most well-evidenced ideas in injury management: good work is good for health. Injured workers who stay connected to the workplace recover faster, protect their mental health and are far more likely to return to their pre-injury role. Employers who support them see lower costs, stronger culture and a more resilient workforce.

An injury does not have to mean isolation. With the right plan, work becomes part of the recovery.

All
June 25, 2026
5 min
New NSW Psychosocial Risk Laws are Here

What changes on 1 July

The driver behind the change is a new section inserted into the Work Health and Safety Act, Section 26 capital A. In short, where the Minister approves a code of practice, a business must comply with that code and manage the relevant hazards to a standard equal to, or higher than, what the code sets out.

This is not to suggest codes of practice didn't matter beforehand. They were always material a prosecutor could rely on. But Section 26A gives them far greater importance. Businesses now need to pay very careful attention to the codes and go through them with a fine-tooth comb, whether the issue is psychosocial hazards, fatigue, or any other code of practice the Minister has approved.

The cost of getting it wrong

Regulators expect evidence that psychosocial safety is managed systematically. You apply the same rigour you would to a plant or manual handling risk assessment: identify, assess and control. The challenge is that there is a lot of ambiguity about what a psychosocial hazard actually is, and it is incumbent on the business to identify them.

The pressure is also financial and personal. Mental health claims are rising, the icare deficit is reported to be growing by around $7 million a day, and there is now personal liability for officers and managers, backed by fines and prosecutions under the Act.

National 17 vs NSW 15: what's the difference?

There are 17 hazards under the national code and 15 under the NSW framework. Safe Work NSW has consolidated the list into broader categories, combining related hazards under broader headings so it's easier for operational use and compliance. The underlying obligations are identical.

Both frameworks require employers to identify, assess and control psychosocial risks, applying the same duty of care and the same hierarchy of controls used elsewhere in work health and safety.

The five hazards that surface most

1. High & low job demands

It's not the occasional late night or early morning. It's the constant, excessive workload that leads to fatigue, then anxiety, which can lead to depression and disengagement. The flip side is just as real: monotonous, repetitive, dull work that isn't stimulating. As Kelly put it, we give our dogs toys so they don't get bored, and it's the same with our workers. The fix is active: switch up tasks, check in, ask how things are going, and balance it so you're not giving them too much.

2. Bullying

Repeated unreasonable behaviour by a person or group toward someone at work. It can be intimidating, belittling or dehumanising. Managers set the tone here. Practical controls include setting very clear expectations of behaviour, a code of conduct that's lived rather than just a piece of paper, modelling respectful language, and containing the louder voices in a room so the quieter ones can speak up. Nip it in the bud early and deal with it immediately, not days or weeks later at an appraisal.

3. Poor organisational justice

It's really just about fairness, where rules aren't applied to everybody equally. One person makes a joke and gets away with it because "that's just who he is," while someone else saying the same thing would be deemed the bully. As Kelly said, the standard you're willing to accept is the standard you walk by. Keep policies and rules uniform, be transparent about why decisions are made, and create open feedback channels people feel psychologically safe to use.

4. Lack of support & the "buckets" problem

James Mattson's caution: as employers we try to put things in buckets, and we shouldn't assume there aren't other buckets we need to deal with. A shy worker who feels intimidated may not fit the bullying bucket from a legal perspective, but the environment may still create a risk to safety that falls into another bucket, like lack of support. Don't assume one label covers everything.

5. Role clarity, isolation & job insecurity

Unclear responsibilities, remote or isolated work, and uncertainty about one's future all carry psychosocial risk, particularly when they accumulate, as the case study shows.

Case study: Kevin

Kelly walked through an anonymised accepted claim that brings these hazards to life. Kevin had worked at a small-to-medium enterprise for around 15 years and was deeply committed to the community he served.

How the hazards accumulated

  • High/low job control: went from operating at a national level to having duties stripped and every task checked by his manager.
  • Bullying & scapegoating: deemed the sole perpetrator of a complaint despite significant evidence to the contrary, including the person who put the claim in saying it wasn't Kevin.
  • Isolation: his team was directed to route all communication through his part-time assistant; he was told not to discuss the situation with anyone.
  • Low, meaningless work: reduced to "tick-and-flick" tasks beneath his role.
  • Job insecurity: no clarity on what his future held; when he asked, he was told to "just carry on" or call EAP.

This continued for almost 12 months, ultimately leaving Kevin off work and unwell for an extended period.

Kelly's reflection: she rarely sees psychological hazards presenting as a single neat issue. It's usually a cluster of problems, and the common thread is that it wasn't identified or addressed early enough.

Spotting the early warning signs

Two signals matter most when a worker isn't speaking up: behaviour change and organisational data.

  • Behaviour change: cameras off in meetings, avoiding people, late-night or 3am emails, missed deadlines from someone previously diligent, withdrawal and disorganisation.
  • Organisational data: rising sick leave and absenteeism, and heavy EAP usage. Kevin accessed more than 20 EAP sessions in less than 10 months, which on its own speaks to a problem and should prompt the question: what's happening for you that you need this level of service?

Building an organisational response

Good practice is proactive, not reactive. Recurring themes from the session:

Use evidence-based surveys to find your pain points. People at Work, the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ), and Guarding Minds at Work all map onto the code framework.

Close the loop. Tell people what you've done or plan to do, and come back to them. Failure to close the loop is a major driver of ongoing insecurity and fear.

Don't rely solely on EAP. It's one control, not a substitute for managing and supporting people internally.

Train and support managers to recognise risk indicators, intervene early, listen actively, and have difficult conversations safely.

Know when to escalate. Bring in external support such as a mediator or workplace facilitator when an issue is beyond internal scope.

Keep it proportionate. Use the data to target real pain points rather than dropping an entire framework on everyone at once.

The legal lens & the workers' comp crossover

James Mattson covered how the new workers' compensation reforms, also commencing 1 July, interact with these obligations. Claims for psychological injury will turn on whether a relevant event caused that injury, and that event is one of four things: bullying, sexual harassment, racial harassment, or excessive work demands. Those issues are looked at through an industrial relations lens.

Reasonable management action remains a legitimate defence, now assessed in the broadest possible sense: was there management action, and was that action reasonable? Importantly, even where the commission finds no compensation is payable, that won't absolve an employer of its work health and safety duties. A worker may say they were bullied during performance management and the commission might find it was reasonable management action, but the employer still needs to provide a safe workplace moving forward. It's just that there won't be compensation.

He also advised pulling disparate plans and policies, such as a bullying policy or a sexual harassment policy, into a single, coherent master psychosocial plan of all the hazards and the measures to control them. The first thing Safe Work will ask is: where are the documents? Where's the plan? Where's the risk assessment? Where's the measures? Where's the safe work procedure?

Webinar
All
No items found.
June 17, 2026
5 min
National Workforce

About National Workforce

National Workforce is a high-volume recruitment and labour hire provider placing large numbers of candidates into physically demanding roles. With workforce turnover and workers compensation claims impacting productivity and costs, selecting the right people is critical to their business.

The Challenge

When National Workforce came to Actevate, they faced a challenge we see often. Their traditional pre-employment screens were slow, costly and largely ineffective, and they struggled to predict which candidates might be at risk of injury or a workers compensation claim.

This left them:

  • Worried about rising workers compensation premiums
  • Spending time and money on screening processes that weren't delivering results
  • At risk of losing their best-performing employees due to poor candidate selection

National Workforce asked Actevate to help because of our proven track record in workforce safety and predictive screening.

The Solution

We followed four steps to solve National Workforce's screening challenge:

  1. Designed a secure, evidence-based pre-employment screening model.
  2. Built a scoring algorithm linking social, challenge and symptom risks with medical history.
  3. Identified the candidates most at risk of injury or protracted claims, while highlighting those with the resilience to return to work quickly.
  4. Provided actionable insights to improve workforce safety and return on investment.

The Results

  • Over 10,000 people have completed the screen
  • Injury and claims rates have dropped dramatically
  • National Workforce now knows which 6% of employees drive 46% of their profits
By replacing slow, ineffective screening with an evidence-based profiling system, National Workforce can now identify its safest, most resilient employees before they start.

Ready to reduce workplace injury, improve employee retention and optimise workforce performance? Get in touch to start the conversation.

All
June 12, 2026
5 min
Allianz

The Situation

Susan* is in a senior position within her industry and has been employed in her chosen field for her entire career. She is a strong-willed, ambitious woman in her early fifties, located in Sydney’s West.

While at work, Susan* experienced two incidents leading to injury that occurred within a year of one another. The first involved an unsecured block of wood falling onto her head and neck, leading to nerve damage. Upon her return to the workplace, Susan* slipped and fell on a metal flooring panel which injured her lower back and hip. Although Susan* initially sustained some serious physical injuries, the most debilitating aspect was the lack of confidence and anxiety she experienced following both incidents.

The challenge

It was a long time before Susan* had suitable duties following her second injury and this only added to her anxiety. Additionally, much of the time she felt uncertain about the duties suggested.

The approach

Susan* was referred to Actevate by Allianz to support her throughout her recovery and to provide a personalised plan to get her back to work safely and effectively. Actevate ensured a multi-disciplinary approach to her treatment and Susan* was very committed to the treatment plan Actevate provided.

The treatment that Actevate recommended to suit Susan’s* needs in this specific situation was a combination of physiotherapy, exercise physiology, psychiatry and psychological counselling. These treatments would sometimes occur in conjunction, depending on the most effective strategy for Susan* and her recovery. Susan’s* treatment progressed well with Actevate’s oversight because she was truly determined to make a full recovery and get back to work.

The transformation

Actevate encouraged improved communication between treating parties and Susan’s* employer to ensure the duties she was expected to achieve were realistic. Everyone involved was on the same page due to the improved communication, and the best thing for Susan’s* recovery turned out to be exposure to the workplace.

Actevate facilitated the communication and bridged the gap between the treatment providers and her employer, which allowed Susan* to return to her role at her own pace without creating more anxiety and panic for her in such an unfamiliar situation.

The Results

Susan* has made a full recovery.

She exercises regularly and has taken up studying as an extracurricular activity. Susan* also reached her ultimate goal of returning to her senior role at work and is continuing with her successful career.

This success was achieved with commitment, dedication and determination despite the odds. Actevate couldn’t be happier to have helped Susan*.

*Name changed to protect the privacy of the worker.

All

Content by Topic

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
June 12, 2026
5 min
Resilience in the Workplace

What Is Resilience?

Search the word "resilience" online and you will find millions of explanations. But what does resilience actually mean, why is it important to you, and how can you benefit from resilience training?

We all respond differently to setbacks, failure and trauma. Some people seem to bounce back quickly, while others get caught in a downward spiral of negative thinking. We all know that person: the one who keeps going after every setback, the one who seems to have "Psychological Teflon". Research suggests this is the effect of resilience (1).

At its core, resilience is the ability to bounce back from adversity. It is the capacity to find perspective, and even opportunity, in a difficult or challenging situation. In the modern workplace, resilience helps us navigate constant change, hybrid work pressures, rapid technology shifts including AI, competing priorities and growing workloads.

Why Is Resilience Important?

Beyond the buzz, evidence shows that people with high resilience have a more balanced outlook on life and believe they can learn from mistakes and challenges. Resilient individuals handle adversity better and rebuild more effectively after major life events such as job loss, financial pressure, relationship breakdown or the death of a loved one.

In everyday life, put simply, resilience builds happiness. It helps us make the most of the challenges we face. Resilience will not prevent difficulties, but it prepares us to deal with them more effectively. You may not realise it, but resilience shapes how we respond in almost every situation. There are probably people in your life or workplace who are juggling multiple stressors yet still show up each day with a smile.

The Cost of Low Resilience in the Workplace

The effects of a non-resilient workplace can be far-reaching. Low levels of resilience have been associated with:

  • Increased absenteeism
  • Higher accident rates and workers compensation claims
  • Reduced morale
  • Poor workplace relationships
  • Reduced output and performance
  • Increased staff turnover

After years of disruption, from the pandemic to economic uncertainty and the rise of AI in the workplace, burnout and change fatigue are at record levels. Being able to identify stressors, and understand the effect they have on you and the people around you, has never been more important. With all of the above creating potentially toxic effects across an organisation, building a culture of resilience through resilience training should be a no-brainer for every employer.

Can Resilience Be Taught?

Some people are naturally more resilient than others, but the evidence is clear: resilience can be learned. Resilience training provides real-world strategies and techniques that help you build your "resilience bank". That way, when a challenge inevitably comes your way, you will have effective tools ready to support you.

Key Takeaways

Resilience is not an extraordinary quality. It is ordinary, attainable and demonstrated by everyday people all around us. But resilience is an active process. We need to keep working on it, for ourselves and for a happy, mentally healthy workforce.

#mentalhealth
All
June 25, 2026
5 min
New NSW Psychosocial Risk Laws are Here

What changes on 1 July

The driver behind the change is a new section inserted into the Work Health and Safety Act, Section 26 capital A. In short, where the Minister approves a code of practice, a business must comply with that code and manage the relevant hazards to a standard equal to, or higher than, what the code sets out.

This is not to suggest codes of practice didn't matter beforehand. They were always material a prosecutor could rely on. But Section 26A gives them far greater importance. Businesses now need to pay very careful attention to the codes and go through them with a fine-tooth comb, whether the issue is psychosocial hazards, fatigue, or any other code of practice the Minister has approved.

The cost of getting it wrong

Regulators expect evidence that psychosocial safety is managed systematically. You apply the same rigour you would to a plant or manual handling risk assessment: identify, assess and control. The challenge is that there is a lot of ambiguity about what a psychosocial hazard actually is, and it is incumbent on the business to identify them.

The pressure is also financial and personal. Mental health claims are rising, the icare deficit is reported to be growing by around $7 million a day, and there is now personal liability for officers and managers, backed by fines and prosecutions under the Act.

National 17 vs NSW 15: what's the difference?

There are 17 hazards under the national code and 15 under the NSW framework. Safe Work NSW has consolidated the list into broader categories, combining related hazards under broader headings so it's easier for operational use and compliance. The underlying obligations are identical.

Both frameworks require employers to identify, assess and control psychosocial risks, applying the same duty of care and the same hierarchy of controls used elsewhere in work health and safety.

The five hazards that surface most

1. High & low job demands

It's not the occasional late night or early morning. It's the constant, excessive workload that leads to fatigue, then anxiety, which can lead to depression and disengagement. The flip side is just as real: monotonous, repetitive, dull work that isn't stimulating. As Kelly put it, we give our dogs toys so they don't get bored, and it's the same with our workers. The fix is active: switch up tasks, check in, ask how things are going, and balance it so you're not giving them too much.

2. Bullying

Repeated unreasonable behaviour by a person or group toward someone at work. It can be intimidating, belittling or dehumanising. Managers set the tone here. Practical controls include setting very clear expectations of behaviour, a code of conduct that's lived rather than just a piece of paper, modelling respectful language, and containing the louder voices in a room so the quieter ones can speak up. Nip it in the bud early and deal with it immediately, not days or weeks later at an appraisal.

3. Poor organisational justice

It's really just about fairness, where rules aren't applied to everybody equally. One person makes a joke and gets away with it because "that's just who he is," while someone else saying the same thing would be deemed the bully. As Kelly said, the standard you're willing to accept is the standard you walk by. Keep policies and rules uniform, be transparent about why decisions are made, and create open feedback channels people feel psychologically safe to use.

4. Lack of support & the "buckets" problem

James Mattson's caution: as employers we try to put things in buckets, and we shouldn't assume there aren't other buckets we need to deal with. A shy worker who feels intimidated may not fit the bullying bucket from a legal perspective, but the environment may still create a risk to safety that falls into another bucket, like lack of support. Don't assume one label covers everything.

5. Role clarity, isolation & job insecurity

Unclear responsibilities, remote or isolated work, and uncertainty about one's future all carry psychosocial risk, particularly when they accumulate, as the case study shows.

Case study: Kevin

Kelly walked through an anonymised accepted claim that brings these hazards to life. Kevin had worked at a small-to-medium enterprise for around 15 years and was deeply committed to the community he served.

How the hazards accumulated

  • High/low job control: went from operating at a national level to having duties stripped and every task checked by his manager.
  • Bullying & scapegoating: deemed the sole perpetrator of a complaint despite significant evidence to the contrary, including the person who put the claim in saying it wasn't Kevin.
  • Isolation: his team was directed to route all communication through his part-time assistant; he was told not to discuss the situation with anyone.
  • Low, meaningless work: reduced to "tick-and-flick" tasks beneath his role.
  • Job insecurity: no clarity on what his future held; when he asked, he was told to "just carry on" or call EAP.

This continued for almost 12 months, ultimately leaving Kevin off work and unwell for an extended period.

Kelly's reflection: she rarely sees psychological hazards presenting as a single neat issue. It's usually a cluster of problems, and the common thread is that it wasn't identified or addressed early enough.

Spotting the early warning signs

Two signals matter most when a worker isn't speaking up: behaviour change and organisational data.

  • Behaviour change: cameras off in meetings, avoiding people, late-night or 3am emails, missed deadlines from someone previously diligent, withdrawal and disorganisation.
  • Organisational data: rising sick leave and absenteeism, and heavy EAP usage. Kevin accessed more than 20 EAP sessions in less than 10 months, which on its own speaks to a problem and should prompt the question: what's happening for you that you need this level of service?

Building an organisational response

Good practice is proactive, not reactive. Recurring themes from the session:

Use evidence-based surveys to find your pain points. People at Work, the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ), and Guarding Minds at Work all map onto the code framework.

Close the loop. Tell people what you've done or plan to do, and come back to them. Failure to close the loop is a major driver of ongoing insecurity and fear.

Don't rely solely on EAP. It's one control, not a substitute for managing and supporting people internally.

Train and support managers to recognise risk indicators, intervene early, listen actively, and have difficult conversations safely.

Know when to escalate. Bring in external support such as a mediator or workplace facilitator when an issue is beyond internal scope.

Keep it proportionate. Use the data to target real pain points rather than dropping an entire framework on everyone at once.

The legal lens & the workers' comp crossover

James Mattson covered how the new workers' compensation reforms, also commencing 1 July, interact with these obligations. Claims for psychological injury will turn on whether a relevant event caused that injury, and that event is one of four things: bullying, sexual harassment, racial harassment, or excessive work demands. Those issues are looked at through an industrial relations lens.

Reasonable management action remains a legitimate defence, now assessed in the broadest possible sense: was there management action, and was that action reasonable? Importantly, even where the commission finds no compensation is payable, that won't absolve an employer of its work health and safety duties. A worker may say they were bullied during performance management and the commission might find it was reasonable management action, but the employer still needs to provide a safe workplace moving forward. It's just that there won't be compensation.

He also advised pulling disparate plans and policies, such as a bullying policy or a sexual harassment policy, into a single, coherent master psychosocial plan of all the hazards and the measures to control them. The first thing Safe Work will ask is: where are the documents? Where's the plan? Where's the risk assessment? Where's the measures? Where's the safe work procedure?

#mentalhealth
All
No items found.